Christopher Connery

892 citations
27 papers · 239 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Connery

22 papers receiving 162 citations

Peers

Christopher Connery
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Cultural Studies 58
  • Geography, Planning and Development 33
  • Anthropology 37
  • Literature and Literary Theory 34
  • History 30
Replace Mauricio Tenorio with:
Mauricio Tenorio Mexico
Richard W. Etulain United States
Brian W. Dippie Canada
Gaines M. Foster United States
Kristin Hoganson United States
Ann Fabian United States
Vanessa R. Schwartz United States
Sharae Deckard Ireland
David Atkinson United Kingdom
Ramón Maíz Suárez Spain
Christopher Connery relative to Mauricio Tenorio Mexico Mauricio Tenorio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Mauricio Tenorio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Connery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Connery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Connery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Connery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Connery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Connery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Connery. The network helps show where Christopher Connery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Connery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Connery Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Connery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The worlding project : doing cultural studies in the era of globalization
200739
2 199435
3 200631
4 200130
5 200623
6
The Empire of the Text: Writing and Authority in Early Imperial China
199819
7 20119
8
Actually Existing Left Conservatism
19996
9 20106
10 19936
11 20114
12 20194
13 20204
14 20063
15 20093
16 20152
17 20232
18 20192
19 20192
20 20092

About Christopher Connery

Christopher Connery is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Cultural Studies and Anthropology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 239 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (5 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (3 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (3 papers), Japanese History and Culture (3 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), Travel Writing and Literature (2 papers) and Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (58 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (33 citations), Anthropology (37 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (34 citations) and History (30 citations). Christopher Connery has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Rob Wilson, Hui Wang, Joseph R. Allen, Jonathan Franzen and Hortense J. Spillers. Their work appears in journals such as boundary 2, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, Historical Materialism, Cultural Studies and PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact