Christopher Connery

896 citations
32 papers · 373 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Connery

26 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers

Christopher Connery
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cultural Studies 83
  • Geography, Planning and Development 53
  • Literature and Literary Theory 74
  • Anthropology 59
  • History 60
Replace Paul Sharrad with:
Paul Sharrad Australia
Marek Tamm Estonia
Christopher L. Miller United States
Alexander Etkind United Kingdom
Matei Călinescu United States
David Atkinson United Kingdom
Robert F. Sayre United States
Srinivas Aravamudan United States
Upamanyu Pablo Mukherjee United Kingdom
Michel Espagne France
Christopher Connery relative to Paul Sharrad Australia Paul Sharrad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Paul Sharrad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Connery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Connery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Connery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Connery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Connery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Connery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Connery. The network helps show where Christopher Connery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Connery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Connery Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Connery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The worlding project : doing cultural studies in the era of globalization
200773
2 199644
3 200637
4 199435
5 200134
6
The Empire of the Text: Writing and Authority in Early Imperial China
199823
7 200623
8 199522
9 201110
10 19969
11 20188
12 20107
13
Actually Existing Left Conservatism
19996
14 19935
15 20114
16 20194
17 20064
18 20204
19 20093
20 20153

About Christopher Connery

Christopher Connery is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Cultural Studies and Anthropology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (5 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (3 papers), Travel Writing and Literature (3 papers), Japanese History and Culture (3 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (3 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (2 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (83 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (53 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (74 citations), Anthropology (59 citations) and History (60 citations). Christopher Connery has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Rob Wilson, Hui Wang, Joseph R. Allen, Jonathan Franzen and Hortense J. Spillers. Their work appears in journals such as boundary 2, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, Historical Materialism, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America and American Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact