Chris Rea

564 citations
28 papers · 288 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Chris Rea

28 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

Chris Rea
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 216
  • Mechanics of Materials 147
  • Condensed Matter Physics 43
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 51
  • Biomedical Engineering 95
Replace Steven Granz with:
Steven Granz United States
Dorothea Buechel Japan
D. Wachenschwanz United States
H. Takano Japan
A.F. Torabi United States
S.W. Yuan United States
F. Kugiya Japan
H.C. Tong United States
H. Iwasaki Japan
Ariyoshi Nakaoki Japan
Chris Rea relative to Steven Granz United States Steven Granz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Steven Granz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Rea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Rea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Rea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Rea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Rea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Rea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Rea. The network helps show where Chris Rea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Rea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris Rea Line = papers co-authored together Chris Rea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201633
2 200228
3 201626
4 201725
5 201819
6 201419
7 201616
8 201814
9 200112
10 201511
11 201710
12 201810
13 201710
14 19988
15 19967
16 20016
17 20175
18 20185
19 20195
20 20184

About Chris Rea

Chris Rea is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (21 papers), Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (16 papers), Near-Field Optical Microscopy (10 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (8 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (5 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (4 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers) and Optical Coatings and Gratings (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (216 citations), Mechanics of Materials (147 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (43 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (51 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (95 citations). Chris Rea has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tim Rausch, Ganping Ju, Edward C. Gage, L. Půst, S. Gangopadhyay, Hua Zhou, Steven Granz, Jan-Ulrich Thiele, Mike Seigler and Peter Czoschke. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, AIP Advances, Surface Science, Physica C Superconductivity and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact