Choll Kim

1.0k citations
28 papers · 774 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 9
    • Management of metastatic bone disease 2
    • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 2
    • Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 2
    • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 13

Choll Kim

27 papers receiving 751 citations

Peers

Choll Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 204
  • Surgery 382
  • Immunology and Allergy 49
  • Cell Biology 110
  • Biomaterials 74
Replace Christoph Gaissmaier with:
Christoph Gaissmaier Germany
Birgit M. Schaefer Germany
Jamie Rayahin United States
Hitoshi Tonomura Japan
Daniel Spazierer Austria
C. Muller France
A.L. Torres Portugal
Jeongmin Hwang United States
William V. Arnold United States
Joanna Czuwara Poland
Choll Kim relative to Christoph Gaissmaier Germany Christoph Gaissmaier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Christoph Gaissmaier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Choll Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Choll Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Choll Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Choll Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Choll Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Choll Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Choll Kim. The network helps show where Choll Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Choll Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Choll Kim Line = papers co-authored together Choll Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007184
2 1996146
3 200680
4 200546
5 200439
6 202035
7 201033
8 200632
9 200425
10 200420
11 201120
12 200719
13 200819
14 201716
15 201714
16 200714
17 20235
18 20205
19 20085
20 20225

About Choll Kim

Choll Kim is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Biomaterials and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 774 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (9 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (2 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (2 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (2 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (2 papers) and Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (204 citations), Surgery (382 citations), Immunology and Allergy (49 citations), Cell Biology (110 citations) and Biomaterials (74 citations). Choll Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Steven R. Garfin, Andrew Mahar, Richard L. Gallo, Tim Odell, Merton Bernfield, Robert Kokenyesi, N. Scott Adzick, Michelle Wedemeyer, Lance Mitsunaga and Lichun Lu. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, The International Journal of Spine Surgery, Spine, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A and Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact