Chih-Ming Wu

684 citations
23 papers · 425 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Chih-Ming Wu

23 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Chih-Ming Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 50
  • Information Systems 127
  • Computer Networks and Communications 96
  • Neurology 28
  • Building and Construction 44
Replace Muhammad Qaiser Saleem with:
Muhammad Qaiser Saleem Pakistan
Ayesha Atta Pakistan
S. Yuvaraj India
Urszula Boryczka Poland
Kamal Upreti India
Ousmane Diallo Senegal
H. Azath India
Xueliang Zhou China
D. Paulraj India
Chih-Ming Wu relative to Muhammad Qaiser Saleem Pakistan Muhammad Qaiser Saleem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Muhammad Qaiser Saleem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chih-Ming Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chih-Ming Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih-Ming Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih-Ming Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chih-Ming Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih-Ming Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih-Ming Wu. The network helps show where Chih-Ming Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chih-Ming Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chih-Ming Wu Line = papers co-authored together Chih-Ming Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202285
2 202065
3 202248
4 202240
5 202140
6 201724
7 201219
8 201819
9 202214
10 202113
11 202211
12 20069
13 20227
14 20195
15 20205
16 20224
17 20094
18 20204
19
The Relationship of CPA Firm's Characteristics and Relationship Marketing Orientation in Taiwan
20073
20 20192

About Chih-Ming Wu

Chih-Ming Wu is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Information Systems, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 23 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BIM and Construction Integration (5 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (4 papers), Underground infrastructure and sustainability (4 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (3 papers), Power Systems and Technologies (3 papers), Design Education and Practice (2 papers), Advanced Neural Network Applications (2 papers) and Technology Assessment and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (50 citations), Information Systems (127 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (96 citations), Neurology (28 citations) and Building and Construction (44 citations). Chih-Ming Wu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Chin‐Ling Chen, Wei Weng, Yong‐Yuan Deng, Woei-Jiunn Tsaur, Mueen Uddin, Wen‐der Yu, Meena Malik, Yi-Jui Chiu, Chi‐Hua Chen and Cheng‐Chi Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Sensors, Sustainability, Frontiers in Public Health, Automation in Construction and Frontiers in Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact