Chiao‐I Tseng

437 citations
31 papers · 257 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Chiao‐I Tseng

26 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers

Chiao‐I Tseng
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Literature and Literary Theory 126
  • Language and Linguistics 78
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
  • Speech and Hearing 27
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 20
Replace Terry Royce with:
Terry Royce Australia
Arsenio Jesús Moya Guijarro Spain
L. M. O'Toole United States
Kristie S. Fleckenstein United States
Elena Di Giovanni Italy
Douglas K. Hartman United States
Bahman Gorjian Iran
Chantelle Warner United States
Roger Beard United Kingdom
Martine Danan United States
Chiao‐I Tseng relative to Terry Royce Australia Terry Royce's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Terry Royce · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chiao‐I Tseng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chiao‐I Tseng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chiao‐I Tseng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chiao‐I Tseng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chiao‐I Tseng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chiao‐I Tseng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chiao‐I Tseng. The network helps show where Chiao‐I Tseng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Chiao‐I Tseng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chiao‐I Tseng Line = papers co-authored together Chiao‐I Tseng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201638
2 201338
3 202130
4 202122
5 201722
6 201313
7 201212
8 201812
9 20129
10 20108
11 20217
12 20236
13 20136
14 20196
15 20205
16 20174
17 20163
18 20173
19 20242
20 20182

About Chiao‐I Tseng

Chiao‐I Tseng is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Gender Studies and Communication, having authored 31 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (8 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (5 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (5 papers), Media Influence and Health (4 papers), Authorship Attribution and Profiling (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (126 citations), Language and Linguistics (78 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (79 citations), Speech and Hearing (27 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (20 citations). Chiao‐I Tseng has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include John Bateman, Emilia Djonov, Jochen Laubrock, Fei Victor Lim, Otthein Herzog, Marion Müller, Arne Jacobs, Janina Wildfeuer, Theo van Leeuwen and Ralph Ewerth. Their work appears in journals such as Discourse Context & Media, Social Semiotics, Semiotica, Visual Communication and Visual Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact