Cheryl Ford

720 citations
11 papers · 402 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Cheryl Ford

11 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Cheryl Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Nephrology 250
  • Emergency Medical Services 66
  • Emergency Medicine 24
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 55
  • Water Science and Technology 38
Replace W.J. Kolff with:
W.J. Kolff United States
J. Rieger Germany
W. Wigger Germany
Thierry Petitclerc France
Salvatore Di Filippo Italy
R. H. Bartlett United States
Laurie J. Garred Canada
Montserrat Carrera Spain
Alice T. Morris United States
Nanette M. Schwann United States
Cheryl Ford relative to W.J. Kolff United States W.J. Kolff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
W.J. Kolff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Ford. The network helps show where Cheryl Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl Ford Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1
Kinetics of hemodiafiltration. I. In vitro transport characteristics of a hollow-fiber blood ultrafilter.
1975136
2 1974107
3 197343
4
Uremic blood cleansing by diafiltration using a hollow fiber ultrafilter.
197021
5 200820
6
Clinical response to maintenance hemodiafiltration.
197520
7 197720
8 199716
9 19779
10 20146
11
Novel applications for hemofiltration membranes.
19814

About Cheryl Ford

Cheryl Ford is a scholar working on Nephrology, Emergency Medical Services, Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (8 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (3 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (2 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (1 paper), Muscle and Compartmental Disorders (1 paper), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (1 paper) and Nosocomial Infections in ICU (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (250 citations), Emergency Medical Services (66 citations), Emergency Medicine (24 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (55 citations) and Water Science and Technology (38 citations). Cheryl Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Lysaght, L.W. Henderson, Carol A. Colton, Lee W. Henderson, Richard A. Stone, Martin Elliot Silverstein, Henderson Lw, J. Lilley, Juan P. Bosch and David W. Britt. Their work appears in journals such as ASAIO Journal, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology and Artificial Organs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact