Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack

11 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Nephrology 300
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 71
  • Emergency Medical Services 39
  • Rehabilitation 36
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 11
Replace Toshiki Kutsuna with:
Toshiki Kutsuna Japan
Matthew J. Clarkson Australia
Lenore R. Zohman United States
Francisco José Martínez-Olmos Spain
Soteris Xenophontos United Kingdom
Dimitrios Stamatiadis Greece
M Stroud United Kingdom
Sarah Pioli Italy
Elaine Paulin Brazil
Jennifer R. Dobratz United States
Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack relative to Toshiki Kutsuna Japan Toshiki Kutsuna's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Toshiki Kutsuna · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack. The network helps show where Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2006192
2 2004124
3 200932
4 199527
5 200318
6 200217
7
Effects of nitric oxide synthase inhibition on regional hemodynamics and oxygen transport in endotoxic dogs.
199513
8 20108
9 19986
10 19994
11 19973

About Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack

Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology, Nephrology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Surgery, having authored 11 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (5 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (3 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (3 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers), Muscle and Compartmental Disorders (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (300 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (71 citations), Emergency Medical Services (39 citations), Rehabilitation (36 citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (11 citations). Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Edwin B. Toffelmire, Trisha Parsons, C. K. Chapler, Jeffrey Mewburn, Stephen M. Cain, S. E. Curtis, Ruth Dubin, Scott E. Curtis, B. Vallet and Thomas A. Walker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physiology, American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Advances in experimental medicine and biology and Clinical Nephrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact