Cheris Kramer

421 citations
11 papers · 310 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Cheris Kramer

11 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

Cheris Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Linguistics and Language 82
  • Gender Studies 141
  • Language and Linguistics 134
  • Literature and Literary Theory 85
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 57
Replace Janet S. Smith with:
Janet S. Smith United States
Christopher J. Zahn United States
Elliot L. Judd United States
Katie Wales United Kingdom
Anne Curzan United States
Donald E. Hardy United States
Florencia Cortés-Conde United States
Susan M. Bacon United States
Hiroko Itakura Hong Kong
Marlène Dolitsky France
Cheris Kramer relative to Janet S. Smith United States Janet S. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Janet S. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheris Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheris Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheris Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheris Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheris Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheris Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheris Kramer. The network helps show where Cheris Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Cheris Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheris Kramer Line = papers co-authored together Cheris Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 197790
2 197482
3 197850
4
Sex-Related Differences in Address Systems.
197524
5 197520
6 197816
7 197811
8 19748
9
Female and Male Perception of Female and Male Speech.
19755
10
Women's and Men's Perception of Female and Male Speech
19752
11
Excessive Loquacity: Women's Speech as Represented in American Etiquette Books.
19752

About Cheris Kramer

Cheris Kramer is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Linguistics and Language, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics and Social Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers), Gender Studies in Language (3 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (1 paper) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (82 citations), Gender Studies (141 citations), Language and Linguistics (134 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (85 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (57 citations). Cheris Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Barrie Thorne, Nancy M. Henley, Ruth Anne Clark and Lee Jenkins. Their work appears in journals such as Communication Quarterly, The Journal of Popular Culture, Quarterly Journal of Speech, Language and Speech and Signs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact