Cher Smith

44 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Cher Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Occupational Therapy 239
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 525
  • Rehabilitation 105
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 222
  • Human-Computer Interaction 80
Replace Lynn A. Worobey with:
Lynn A. Worobey United States
Ed Giesbrecht Canada
Rosemarie Cooper United States
Peter W. Axelson United States
Richard M. Schein United States
Elaine Trefler United States
Deborah Gavin-Dreschnack United States
Emily E. Teodorski United States
James A. Lenker United States
Yen-Ho Wang Taiwan
Cher Smith relative to Lynn A. Worobey United States Lynn A. Worobey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Lynn A. Worobey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cher Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cher Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cher Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cher Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cher Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cher Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cher Smith. The network helps show where Cher Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cher Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cher Smith Line = papers co-authored together Cher Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004156
2 2003127
3 2005121
4 200475
5 201655
6 201555
7 200454
8 200449
9 201447
10 200538
11 201033
12 201133
13 200629
14 200525
15 201425
16 200321
17 201120
18 202020
19 200815
20 200815

About Cher Smith

Cher Smith is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Occupational Therapy, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (20 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (7 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (6 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (2 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (1 paper) and Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (239 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (525 citations), Rehabilitation (105 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (222 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (80 citations). Cher Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Lee Kirby, Donald A. MacLeod, Krista L. Best, Angela H. MacPhee, Anita D. Mountain, Debbie J. Dupuis, Kara J. Thompson, Paula W. Rushton, François Routhier and Kim E. Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Disability and Rehabilitation and International Journal of Disability Development and Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact