Chen‐Pin Chou

620 citations
47 papers · 444 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Chen‐Pin Chou

46 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Chen‐Pin Chou
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 157
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 196
  • Cancer Research 62
  • Urology 25
  • Oncology 103
Replace Jean-François Geschwind with:
Jean-François Geschwind United States
Jim Zhong United Kingdom
Tommaso Perretta Italy
Petra M. M. Beemsterboer Netherlands
Bonnie Choy United States
S. Mussurakis United Kingdom
V. Bishay United States
Eduard Roussel Belgium
Mufaddal Mamawala United States
Sennett K. Kim United States
Chen‐Pin Chou relative to Jean-François Geschwind United States Jean-François Geschwind's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jean-François Geschwind · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chen‐Pin Chou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chen‐Pin Chou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chen‐Pin Chou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chen‐Pin Chou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chen‐Pin Chou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chen‐Pin Chou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chen‐Pin Chou. The network helps show where Chen‐Pin Chou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chen‐Pin Chou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chen‐Pin Chou Line = papers co-authored together Chen‐Pin Chou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201573
2 201338
3 201125
4 202019
5 202018
6 201318
7 201417
8 200917
9 200516
10 201316
11 201515
12 201013
13 202012
14 201712
15 201511
16 202111
17 200610
18 20169
19 20129
20 20229

About Chen‐Pin Chou

Chen‐Pin Chou is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Artificial Intelligence and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 47 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (11 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (10 papers), AI in cancer detection (9 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (8 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (6 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (157 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (196 citations), Cancer Research (62 citations), Urology (25 citations) and Oncology (103 citations). Chen‐Pin Chou has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Huay‐Ben Pan, Jer‐Shyung Huang, Tsung‐Lung Yang, Chia‐Ling Chiang, Huei‐Lung Liang, Ya‐Wen Chen, Hui‐Hwa Tseng, John Lewin, Jia-Bin Liao and Yu‐Ting Hung. Their work appears in journals such as The Breast Journal, PLoS ONE, American Journal of Roentgenology, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and European Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact