Chenkun Qi

1.8k citations
96 papers · 1.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Chenkun Qi

90 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Chenkun Qi
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Control and Systems Engineering 788
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 120
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 61
  • Numerical Analysis 44
  • Biomedical Engineering 338
Replace Honghua Dai with:
Honghua Dai China
Mario E. Salgado Chile
Suhada Jayasuriya United States
Mouhacine Benosman United States
David Daney United States
João Y. Ishihara Brazil
P. Agathoklis Canada
Stefan F. Graebe Australia
Zhigang Ren China
Liu Hsu Brazil
Chenkun Qi relative to Honghua Dai China Honghua Dai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Honghua Dai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chenkun Qi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chenkun Qi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chenkun Qi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chenkun Qi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chenkun Qi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chenkun Qi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chenkun Qi. The network helps show where Chenkun Qi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chenkun Qi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chenkun Qi Line = papers co-authored together Chenkun Qi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010229
2 201181
3 201059
4 200956
5 201852
6 200946
7 202343
8 200939
9 201038
10 200837
11 201337
12 200831
13 201426
14 201425
15 202222
16 201421
17 201419
18 201719
19 201519
20 201319

About Chenkun Qi

Chenkun Qi is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 96 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotic Locomotion and Control (30 papers), Space Satellite Systems and Control (22 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (15 papers), Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems (14 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (13 papers), Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics (12 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (11 papers) and Control Systems and Identification (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Control and Systems Engineering (788 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (120 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (61 citations), Numerical Analysis (44 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (338 citations). Chenkun Qi has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Han‐Xiong Li, Feng Gao, Feng Gao, Xianchao Zhao, Xianbao Chen, Shaoyuan Li, Yue Zhao, Xianxia Zhang, Yongguang Yu and Hai‐Tao Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Mechanism and Machine Theory, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Journal of Process Control and Acta Astronautica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact