Chen Mi

1.2k citations
63 papers · 952 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Chen Mi

55 papers receiving 933 citations

Peers

Chen Mi
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Cancer Research 239
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 52
  • Reproductive Medicine 55
  • Computer Networks and Communications 135
  • Pharmacology 41
Replace Jiabin Chen with:
Jiabin Chen China
Junqiu Yue China
Qiao Zhang China
Prabhakar Chalise United States
Jing Cao China
Dragica Radojković Serbia
Shun Zhang China
Naoki Terada Japan
Chen Mi relative to Jiabin Chen China Jiabin Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×45×
Jiabin Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chen Mi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chen Mi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chen Mi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chen Mi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chen Mi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chen Mi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chen Mi. The network helps show where Chen Mi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chen Mi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chen Mi Line = papers co-authored together Chen Mi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009159
2 2018111
3 2008110
4 201876
5 201468
6
Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas (updated), 2018
202035
7 201830
8 201929
9 201626
10 201524
11 201624
12 202023
13 201720
14 201420
15 200719
16 202016
17 201415
18 202114
19 202114
20 200710

About Chen Mi

Chen Mi is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Cancer Research, having authored 63 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (12 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (7 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Circular RNAs in diseases (3 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (239 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (52 citations), Reproductive Medicine (55 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (135 citations) and Pharmacology (41 citations). Chen Mi has collaborated with scholars based in China, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wei Wang, Kun Tan, Jian-Song Zhang, He Liu, Ji Fang, Geoffrey M. Voelker, Shuixiang He, Mudan Ren, Yarui Li and Yan Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, Cell Death and Disease, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging and Advanced Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact