Charles Holcombe
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Japanese History and Culture
- Anthropology top 10%
- Eurasian Exchange Networks
- Philippine History and Culture
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 22
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 3
- China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations 3
-
- Japanese History and Culture 8
- Co-authors
- Mark Edward Lewis (1 shared paper)Chün-chieh Huang (1 shared paper)Cho-yün Hsü (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (4 papers)Journal of the American Oriental Society (4 papers)Historian (3 papers)University of Hawaii Press eBooks (2 papers)Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Charles Holcombe
18 papers receiving 135 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Cultural Studies 62
- Anthropology 45
- Sociology and Political Science 169
- Religious studies 15
- Archeology 2
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Holcombe
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Holcombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Holcombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Holcombe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Holcombe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Holcombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Holcombe. The network helps show where Charles Holcombe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Charles Holcombe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 120 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 22 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 1 |
About Charles Holcombe
Charles Holcombe is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 218 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (22 papers), Japanese History and Culture (8 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers), China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (3 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (2 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (1 paper), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (62 citations), Anthropology (45 citations), Sociology and Political Science (169 citations), Religious studies (15 citations) and Archeology (2 citations). Charles Holcombe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark Edward Lewis, Chün-chieh Huang and Cho-yün Hsü. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Historian, University of Hawaii Press eBooks and Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.