Charles Frederick Eagen

995 citations
14 papers · 792 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Charles Frederick Eagen

14 papers receiving 719 citations

Peers

Charles Frederick Eagen
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 252
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 355
  • Radiation 81
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 54
  • Biomedical Engineering 221
Replace A. Krämer with:
A. Krämer Germany
Bouwe Bolger Netherlands
Daisuke Kobayashi Japan
M. W. Hart United States
Daisuke Abe Japan
Stefan Wittekoek Netherlands
Kenneth G. Mckay United Kingdom
Teturô Inui Japan
M. Allegrini Italy
R. J. Chichester United States
Charles Frederick Eagen relative to A. Krämer Germany A. Krämer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
A. Krämer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Frederick Eagen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Frederick Eagen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Frederick Eagen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Frederick Eagen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Frederick Eagen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Frederick Eagen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Frederick Eagen. The network helps show where Charles Frederick Eagen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Charles Frederick Eagen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Frederick Eagen Line = papers co-authored together Charles Frederick Eagen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1979246
2 1975225
3 198153
4 197944
5 198040
6 199838
7 197535
8 197629
9 197528
10 197519
11 197718
12 197613
13 19722
14 20052

About Charles Frederick Eagen

Charles Frederick Eagen is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Inorganic Chemistry, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 792 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (4 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (3 papers), Inorganic Chemistry and Materials (3 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (2 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (2 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (2 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (1 paper) and Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (252 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (355 citations), Radiation (81 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (54 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (221 citations). Charles Frederick Eagen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include W. Weber, S. A. Werner, R. Colella, A. W. Overhauser, C. R. Peters, Roger B. Saillant, L.A. Feldkamp, Danil V. Prokhorov, R. W. Terhune and S. L. McCarthy. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Review of Scientific Instruments, Inorganic Chemistry, Chemical Physics Letters and Applied Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact