Charles Fields

598 citations
24 papers · 401 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Charles Fields

22 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers

Charles Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 191
  • Nephrology 41
  • Biomaterials 68
  • Surgery 148
  • Internal Medicine 9
Replace Harriet Hédin with:
Harriet Hédin Sweden
Mesut Gürdal Türkiye
Karl‐Heinz Dietl Germany
Richard L. Burleson United States
Giuseppe Buscemi Italy
Sheil Ag Australia
Jiří Moláček Czechia
Anastasios Karatzas Greece
Z Drolc United Kingdom
M Haimov United States
Charles Fields relative to Harriet Hédin Sweden Harriet Hédin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Harriet Hédin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Fields. The network helps show where Charles Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Fields Line = papers co-authored together Charles Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006148
2 195735
3 200130
4 200228
5 200227
6 199119
7 200219
8 197618
9 199015
10
Vasomotor tone and the role of nitric oxide.
199812
11 200011
12 20048
13 19726
14 19555
15 19635
16 19993
17 20003
18 19532
19
Simultaneous dermoid cyst of the tube and ectopic pregnancy.
19602
20 19572

About Charles Fields

Charles Fields is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Epidemiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vascular Procedures and Complications (5 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (3 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (3 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (3 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (2 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers) and Soft tissue tumor case studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (191 citations), Nephrology (41 citations), Biomaterials (68 citations), Surgery (148 citations) and Internal Medicine (9 citations). Charles Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Thomas C. Bower, Jean M. Panneton, Tanya L. Hoskin, Péter Gloviczki, Timothy M. Sullivan, Kenneth J. Cherry, Leslie T. Cooper, Audra A. Noel, Raymond G. Makhoul and Anthony Cassano. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Biomaterials Applications, Journal of Vascular Surgery, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey and Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact