Charlene E. Caefer

25 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

Charlene E. Caefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Media Technology 96
  • Aerospace Engineering 195
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 244
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 108
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 20
Replace Wolfgang Ackermann with:
Wolfgang Ackermann Germany
Akihiko Hirata Japan
Jan Bogaerts Belgium
Paul W. Kervin United States
Richard L. Kendrick United States
Mark F. Spencer United States
James T. Aberle United States
Clyde L. Ruthroff Canada
Joakim Hallin Sweden
Tamer Mostafa Abuelfadl Egypt
Charlene E. Caefer relative to Wolfgang Ackermann Germany Wolfgang Ackermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.7×
Wolfgang Ackermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charlene E. Caefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charlene E. Caefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlene E. Caefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlene E. Caefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charlene E. Caefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlene E. Caefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlene E. Caefer. The network helps show where Charlene E. Caefer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Charlene E. Caefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charlene E. Caefer Line = papers co-authored together Charlene E. Caefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989163
2 198754
3 200047
4 200736
5 199828
6 198720
7 200219
8 200218
9 199717
10 199817
11 199616
12 198914
13 200214
14 199513
15 200311
16
Point target detection in consecutive frame staring IR imagery with evolving cloud clutter.
199510
17 20046
18 19954
19 19933
20 20003

About Charlene E. Caefer

Charlene E. Caefer is a scholar working on Media Technology, Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 25 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (14 papers), Remote-Sensing Image Classification (9 papers), Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (4 papers), solar cell performance optimization (1 paper), Radiation Effects in Electronics (1 paper) and Radar Systems and Signal Processing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (96 citations), Aerospace Engineering (195 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (244 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (108 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (20 citations). Charlene E. Caefer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jerry Silverman, Peter J. Drevinsky, Lionel C. Kimerling, Janet L. Benton, Moses T. Asom, Jonathan Martin Mooney, Stanley R. Rotman, Stephen P. Tobin, James C. Mikkelsen and Virgil E. Vickers. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Journal of Applied Physics, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Optical Engineering and Infrared Physics & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact