Chang‐Mo Ryu

1.8k citations
98 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Chang‐Mo Ryu

91 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Chang‐Mo Ryu
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 548
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 751
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 305
  • Geophysics 218
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 116
Replace Kurt Haller with:
Kurt Haller United States
Scott Baalrud United States
B. P. Pandey Australia
Dietmar Block Germany
Predhiman Kaw India
R. A. Stern United States
Евгений Павлович Велихов Russia
В. С. Филинов Russia
Patrick Pribyl United States
D. Samsonov Germany
Chang‐Mo Ryu relative to Kurt Haller United States Kurt Haller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Kurt Haller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chang‐Mo Ryu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chang‐Mo Ryu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chang‐Mo Ryu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chang‐Mo Ryu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chang‐Mo Ryu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chang‐Mo Ryu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chang‐Mo Ryu. The network helps show where Chang‐Mo Ryu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chang‐Mo Ryu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chang‐Mo Ryu Line = papers co-authored together Chang‐Mo Ryu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200587
2 200778
3 200677
4 199860
5 200553
6 199543
7 200542
8 200641
9 201440
10 200538
11 200938
12 200835
13 199734
14 200833
15 200832
16 200232
17 200631
18 202022
19 200120
20 199620

About Chang‐Mo Ryu

Chang‐Mo Ryu is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (39 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (32 papers), Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena (24 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (23 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (18 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (17 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (13 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (548 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (751 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (305 citations), Geophysics (218 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (116 citations). Chang‐Mo Ryu has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Peter H. Yoon, Tongnyeol Rhee, Sam Young Cho, Devki Nandan Gupta, Cheong Rim Choi, Chul Koo Kim, Sangchul Oh, Jae Koo Lee, Felipe Iza and Jun Choi. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Physics Letters A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact