Chad Lieberman

9 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

Chad Lieberman
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 107
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 130
  • Numerical Analysis 44
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 47
  • Statistics and Probability 23
Replace Jonas Latz with:
Jonas Latz United Kingdom
Timothy Wildey United States
Masoumeh Dashti United Kingdom
Bamdad Hosseini United States
Tobin Isaac United States
Jakob Zech Switzerland
Abdellah Chkifa France
Denis Ridzal United States
Yiping Lu China
Tarek Moselhy United States
Chad Lieberman relative to Jonas Latz United Kingdom Jonas Latz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Jonas Latz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chad Lieberman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chad Lieberman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chad Lieberman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chad Lieberman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chad Lieberman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chad Lieberman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chad Lieberman. The network helps show where Chad Lieberman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Chad Lieberman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chad Lieberman Line = papers co-authored together Chad Lieberman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2010169
2 201062
3 201212
4 201312
5 200610
6 20148
7 20127
8
On Adaptive Choice of Shifts in Rational Krylov Subspace Reduction of Evolutionary Problems
20102
9
Parameter and State Model Reduction for Large-Scale Statistical Inverse Problems
20102

About Chad Lieberman

Chad Lieberman is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Ocean Engineering and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Model Reduction and Neural Networks (5 papers), Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference (4 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (3 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (2 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (2 papers), Scientific Research and Discoveries (1 paper), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (1 paper) and Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (107 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (130 citations), Numerical Analysis (44 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (47 citations) and Statistics and Probability (23 citations). Chad Lieberman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen Willcox, Omar Ghattas, Mikhail Zaslavsky, Vladimir Druskin, Bart van Bloemen Waanders, John W. M. Bush, Krzysztof Fidkowski and Jeffrey M. Aristoff. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, SIAM Review, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids and Physics of Fluids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact