Chad C. Smith

597 citations
15 papers · 366 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Chad C. Smith

15 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers

Chad C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 199
  • Physiology 38
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 77
  • Insect Science 63
  • Genetics 98
Replace Cosima Hotzy with:
Cosima Hotzy Sweden
Angelika G. Denk Germany
Loïc Lesobre France
Kris Sales United Kingdom
Outi Ala‐Honkola Finland
Alyson J. Lumley United Kingdom
Ramakrishnan Vasudeva United Kingdom
Tomas Kay Switzerland
Andreas Sutter United Kingdom
Kathryn B. McNamara Australia
Chad C. Smith relative to Cosima Hotzy Sweden Cosima Hotzy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Cosima Hotzy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chad C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chad C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chad C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chad C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chad C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chad C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chad C. Smith. The network helps show where Chad C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Chad C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chad C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Chad C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200755
2 202153
3 200648
4 201239
5 201037
6 201736
7 201125
8 201518
9 201415
10 201914
11 200811
12 20167
13 20134
14
SEXUAL CONFLICT AND DENSITY DEPENDENCE IN THE WESTERN MOSQUITOFISH, GAMBUSIA AFFINIS (POECILIIDAE)
20053
15
Xiphophorus nigrensis Tactic-dependent plasticity in ejaculate traits in the swordtail
20111

About Chad C. Smith

Chad C. Smith is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science and Physiology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (9 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (4 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (2 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (2 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (199 citations), Physiology (38 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (77 citations), Insect Science (63 citations) and Genetics (98 citations). Chad C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Ryan, Robert Craig Sargent, Ulrich G. Mueller, Robert B. Srygley, Frank Healy, Kathleen Burns, Joseph Edwards, David L. Des Marais, Melissa R. Kardish and Thomas Juenger. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Frontiers in Microbiology, Molecular Ecology, Environmental Microbiology Reports and Behavioral Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact