César Cestári

453 citations
33 papers · 192 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

César Cestári

32 papers receiving 188 citations

Peers

César Cestári
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 100
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 58
  • Ecological Modeling 19
  • Ecology 112
  • Developmental Biology 6
Replace Faith A. M. Jones with:
Faith A. M. Jones United Kingdom
Glaucia Del‐Rio Brazil
Csaba Béla Eötvös Hungary
Andrew Hart Reeve Denmark
Débora Goedert United States
Hidayat Ashari Indonesia
Glauco Alves Pereira Brazil
Brian J. O’Shea United States
Thiago Vernaschi Vieira da Costa Brazil
Paulo de Tarso Zuquim Antas Brazil
César Cestári relative to Faith A. M. Jones United Kingdom Faith A. M. Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Faith A. M. Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by César Cestári

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of César Cestári's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by César Cestári with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites César Cestári more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by César Cestári

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by César Cestári. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by César Cestári. The network helps show where César Cestári may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside César Cestári, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with César Cestári Line = papers co-authored together César Cestári links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200921
2 200810
3
Utilization of epiphytes by birds in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest
200810
4 201110
5 201610
6 20139
7 20228
8 20108
9 20128
10 20148
11
O uso de plantas epífitas por aves no Brasil
20097
12 20177
13 20197
14 20116
15 20095
16 20145
17 20115
18 20135
19 20135
20 20185

About César Cestári

César Cestári is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science and Ecological Modeling, having authored 33 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (22 papers), Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (10 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (6 papers), Marine animal studies overview (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (100 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (58 citations), Ecological Modeling (19 citations), Ecology (112 citations) and Developmental Biology (6 citations). César Cestári has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marco Aurélio Pizo, Cristina da Silva Gonçalves, Celine de Melo, Bette A. Loiselle, André de Camargo Guaraldo, José Fernando Pacheco, Iván Sazima, Erik I. Johnson, Rebecca T. Kimball and Marina Anciães. Their work appears in journals such as acta ethologica, Evolutionary Ecology, Zootaxa, PLoS ONE and Austral Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact