Celia Chen

49 papers receiving 841 citations

Peers

Celia Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Software 72
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 104
  • Ophthalmology 69
  • Oncology 160
  • Information Systems 135
Replace Stefan Scheidl with:
Stefan Scheidl Austria
Timo Lehtonen Finland
Chun Zhang China
Sandeep Goel India
Robert P. Sanders United States
Ryan G. Short United States
Yuxuan Wu China
Jung‐Kyu Han South Korea
Michael Homer New Zealand
Bernhard Berger Germany
Celia Chen relative to Stefan Scheidl Austria Stefan Scheidl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Stefan Scheidl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celia Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Chen. The network helps show where Celia Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celia Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celia Chen Line = papers co-authored together Celia Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996139
2 2004127
3 200372
4 200366
5 200443
6 201734
7 201426
8
Endoscopic modified lothrop procedure: an alternative for frontal osteoma excision.
200425
9 201723
10 201623
11 202021
12 200321
13 200420
14 200619
15 201718
16 200916
17 201716
18 201813
19 201612
20 201811

About Celia Chen

Celia Chen is a scholar working on Information Systems, Epidemiology, Computer Networks and Communications, Software and Ophthalmology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 886 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (16 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (8 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (7 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (7 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (72 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (104 citations), Ophthalmology (69 citations), Oncology (160 citations) and Information Systems (135 citations). Celia Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Dinesh Selva, Francis X. Diebold, Shyamala C. Huilgol, Dudley Hill, Raman Malhotra, Barry Boehm, Lin Shi, Craig James, Peter‐John Wormald and Peter E.J. Davies. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Neurorehabilitation and Journal of Econometrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact