Celia Chen

47 papers receiving 775 citations

Peers

Celia Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Software 59
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 100
  • Ophthalmology 55
  • Oncology 145
  • Finance 52
Replace Simon Price with:
Simon Price United Kingdom
Yuxuan Wu China
Timo Lehtonen Finland
Robert P. Sanders United States
Chun Zhang China
Ryan G. Short United States
Ivan Ivanović Serbia
Jared Katzman United States
Michael Homer New Zealand
Marcus Spies Germany
Celia Chen relative to Simon Price United Kingdom Simon Price's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.8×
Simon Price · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celia Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Chen. The network helps show where Celia Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celia Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celia Chen Line = papers co-authored together Celia Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996134
2 2004113
3 200366
4 200359
5 200439
6 201733
7 201425
8
Endoscopic modified lothrop procedure: an alternative for frontal osteoma excision.
200425
9 201623
10 202021
11 201720
12 200318
13 200618
14 201718
15 200416
16 201716
17 200915
18 201813
19 202010
20 201810

About Celia Chen

Celia Chen is a scholar working on Information Systems, Epidemiology, Computer Networks and Communications, Software and Ophthalmology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 814 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (14 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (7 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (7 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (59 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (100 citations), Ophthalmology (55 citations), Oncology (145 citations) and Finance (52 citations). Celia Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Dinesh Selva, Francis X. Diebold, Shyamala C. Huilgol, Barry Boehm, Dudley Hill, Raman Malhotra, Lin Shi, Peter‐John Wormald, Craig James and Peter E.J. Davies. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Ophthalmology and Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact