Cécile Ginane

1.0k citations
40 papers · 800 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Cécile Ginane

36 papers receiving 774 citations

Peers

Cécile Ginane
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 338
  • Forestry 95
  • Animal Science and Zoology 235
  • Small Animals 165
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 116
Replace Sheldon B. Atwood with:
Sheldon B. Atwood United States
Michel Meuret France
Sophie Prache France
Elizabeth A Burritt United States
M. Petit France
Roger E. Banner United States
J.P. Garel France
R. D. Wiedmeier United States
Karen L. Launchbaugh United States
R. A. Champion United Kingdom
Cécile Ginane relative to Sheldon B. Atwood United States Sheldon B. Atwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Sheldon B. Atwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cécile Ginane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cécile Ginane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cécile Ginane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cécile Ginane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cécile Ginane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cécile Ginane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cécile Ginane. The network helps show where Cécile Ginane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cécile Ginane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cécile Ginane Line = papers co-authored together Cécile Ginane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201172
2 201264
3 200753
4 201546
5 201145
6 200444
7 201638
8 201635
9 201232
10 200232
11 200331
12 201629
13 200626
14 200925
15 201023
16 200523
17 200522
18 201421
19 200521
20 201013

About Cécile Ginane

Cécile Ginane is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 800 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (17 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (13 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (12 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (12 papers), Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (9 papers), Helminth infection and control (5 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (5 papers) and Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (338 citations), Forestry (95 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (235 citations), Small Animals (165 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (116 citations). Cécile Ginane has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Angélique Favreau-Peigné, Bertrand Dumont, René Baumont, René Baumont, Alan J. Duncan, Michel Petit, Juan J. Villalba, Vincent Niderkorn, Giuseppe Copani and Anne A. Farruggia. Their work appears in journals such as animal, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Journal of Animal Science, Animal Production Science and Behavioural Processes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact