C.E. Violet

1.9k citations
43 papers · 806 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

C.E. Violet

41 papers receiving 703 citations

Peers

C.E. Violet
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Condensed Matter Physics 351
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 230
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 390
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 123
  • Radiation 50
Replace G. J. Perlow with:
G. J. Perlow United States
J. O. Thomson United States
R. Keitel Canada
A. H. Muir United States
H. G. Devare India
J. Heberle United States
H. Bjerrum Møller Denmark
J.-L. Staudenmann United States
G. E. Devlin United States
F. D. Feiock United States
C.E. Violet relative to G. J. Perlow United States G. J. Perlow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
G. J. Perlow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.E. Violet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.E. Violet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.E. Violet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.E. Violet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.E. Violet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.E. Violet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.E. Violet. The network helps show where C.E. Violet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.E. Violet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.E. Violet Line = papers co-authored together C.E. Violet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1966112
2 197182
3 196365
4 196456
5 195956
6 196750
7 197249
8 196639
9 197231
10 198428
11 197128
12 195727
13 196326
14 196323
15 195613
16 195212
17 199312
18 196111
19 19568
20 19567

About C.E. Violet

C.E. Violet is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Mechanics of Materials and Radiation, having authored 43 papers that have together received 806 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (13 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (7 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (7 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (7 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (6 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (5 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers) and X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (351 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (230 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (390 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (123 citations) and Radiation (50 citations). C.E. Violet has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include R. J. Borg, Rex Booth, G. W. Johnson, G.H. Higgins, R. S. White, R. Booth, D.Y.F. Lai, J. W. Shearer, F. Wooten and F. Rainer. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physica C Superconductivity, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Physics Letters A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact