C.C.S. Lim

679 citations
20 papers · 460 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

C.C.S. Lim

19 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

C.C.S. Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 249
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 87
  • Surgery 150
  • Emergency Medicine 28
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 39
Replace Ali Farhat with:
Ali Farhat United States
François Dérimay France
Katsuya Miura Japan
June Yamrozik United States
K. Soon Australia
Fabián Chaustre Spain
Mitsunori Abe Japan
Marit Kristine Smedsrud Norway
Erica C. Jones United States
Sumeet K. Mainigi United States
C.C.S. Lim relative to Ali Farhat United States Ali Farhat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Ali Farhat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.C.S. Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.C.S. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.C.S. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.C.S. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.C.S. Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.C.S. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.C.S. Lim. The network helps show where C.C.S. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.C.S. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.C.S. Lim Line = papers co-authored together C.C.S. Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201192
2 201055
3 200951
4 201147
5
Management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention era.
201047
6 201136
7 201128
8 201121
9 201120
10 201516
11
Optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection.
201013
12 201112
13 20146
14 20075
15 20124
16 20053
17 20152
18 20161
19 20071
20 20130

About C.C.S. Lim

C.C.S. Lim is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 20 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (3 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (2 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (2 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (1 paper) and Amoebic Infections and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (249 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (87 citations), Surgery (150 citations), Emergency Medicine (28 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (39 citations). C.C.S. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Adrian Banning, Florim Cuculi, David Adlam, William J. van Gaal, Theodoros D. Karamitsos, Stefan Neubauer, Luca Testa, Jayanth R. Arnold, Jane M Francis and Stephen Westaby. Their work appears in journals such as Heart, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, International Journal of Cardiology, European Heart Journal and Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact