C.C. Damm

465 citations
26 papers · 255 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

C.C. Damm

23 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers

C.C. Damm
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 124
  • Radiation 39
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 61
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 95
  • Spectroscopy 39
Replace Peter R. Phillips with:
Peter R. Phillips United States
G. S. Voronov Russia
R. W. Harper United States
B. Dudelzak France
J. Hilke Sweden
R. S. Harp United States
F. Wising Sweden
O. Czyžewski Switzerland
S. Limentani Italy
B. D. Jones United Kingdom
C.C. Damm relative to Peter R. Phillips United States Peter R. Phillips's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Peter R. Phillips · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.C. Damm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.C. Damm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.C. Damm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.C. Damm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.C. Damm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.C. Damm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.C. Damm. The network helps show where C.C. Damm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside C.C. Damm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.C. Damm Line = papers co-authored together C.C. Damm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196128
2 196527
3 196325
4 195624
5 196420
6 199018
7 196317
8 195315
9 198915
10 197014
11 196213
12 196110
13 19637
14 19716
15 19673
16
TMX-U experimental results
19833
17 19842
18
STABILITY OF A MAGNETICALLY CONFINED 20-kev STEADY-STATE PLASMA
19652
19
A high-fluence fusion neutron source
19881
20 19631

About C.C. Damm

C.C. Damm is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation, Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (14 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (8 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (8 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (7 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (3 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (3 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (3 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (124 citations), Radiation (39 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (61 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (95 citations) and Spectroscopy (39 citations). C.C. Damm has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A.H. Futch, L. G. Smith, A. L. Hunt, J. H. Foote, R.F. Post, Frank J. Gordon, F.H. Coensgen, B.G. Logan, T. A. Casper and A.W. Molvik. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Review of Scientific Instruments, Nuclear Fusion, Journal of Fusion Energy and Nuclear Science and Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact