Catherine E. Boyd
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Face Recognition and Perception
- Memory Processes and Influences
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Classics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 2
-
- Memory Processes and Influences 3
- Face Recognition and Perception 2
- Co-authors
- Colin Getty Tredoux (3 shared papers)Daniel B. Wright (2 shared papers)Michael Burleigh (1 shared paper)Daniel B. Wright (1 shared paper)Stefanie J. Sharman (1 shared paper)Martine B. Powell (1 shared paper)Patrick O’Leary (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychology Public Policy and Law (2 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)Psychiatry Psychology and Law (1 paper)Applied Cognitive Psychology (1 paper)History Reviews of New Books (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Catherine E. Boyd
11 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Cognitive Neuroscience 164
- Classics 33
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 92
- History 75
- Social Psychology 54
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine E. Boyd
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine E. Boyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine E. Boyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine E. Boyd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine E. Boyd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine E. Boyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine E. Boyd. The network helps show where Catherine E. Boyd may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Catherine E. Boyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 103 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 101 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1955 | 33 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1954 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 11 | Working with young homeless men and violence - A gathering of communities | 2000 | 1 |
| 12 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 0 |
About Catherine E. Boyd
Catherine E. Boyd is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, History, Political Science and International Relations and Classics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European history and politics (3 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (2 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Deception detection and forensic psychology (1 paper), Diverse academic and cultural studies (1 paper) and Medical History and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (164 citations), Classics (33 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (92 citations), History (75 citations) and Social Psychology (54 citations). Catherine E. Boyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Colin Getty Tredoux, Daniel B. Wright, Michael Burleigh, Daniel B. Wright, Stefanie J. Sharman, Martine B. Powell and Patrick O’Leary. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology Public Policy and Law, The American Historical Review, Psychiatry Psychology and Law, Applied Cognitive Psychology and History Reviews of New Books.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.