Caroline E. Fox

25 papers receiving 238 citations

Peers

Caroline E. Fox
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 90
  • Hematology 89
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 28
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 12
  • Genetics 9
Replace Joanna Davies with:
Joanna Davies United Kingdom
Carmen L. Regan Ireland
K. H. Shwe United Kingdom
R. J. P. Rijnders Netherlands
Elizabeth S. Sebring United States
Móiad Alazzam United Kingdom
LUIGI ALIO Italy
Ellen H. M. de Kort Netherlands
Claartje M. A. Huisman Netherlands
Marianna Pina Rambaldi Italy
Caroline E. Fox relative to Joanna Davies United Kingdom Joanna Davies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Joanna Davies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline E. Fox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline E. Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline E. Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline E. Fox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline E. Fox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline E. Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline E. Fox. The network helps show where Caroline E. Fox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline E. Fox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline E. Fox Line = papers co-authored together Caroline E. Fox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200955
2 200753
3 200534
4 200919
5 201215
6 200910
7 20169
8 20107
9 20066
10 20146
11 20226
12 20165
13 20215
14 20235
15 20124
16 20244
17 20254
18 20093
19 20123
20 20062

About Caroline E. Fox

Caroline E. Fox is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Epidemiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (9 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (7 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (2 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (2 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (2 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (90 citations), Hematology (89 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (28 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (12 citations) and Genetics (9 citations). Caroline E. Fox has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Mark David Kilby, Khalid Saeed Khan, Samantha J. Pretlove, Peter J. Thompson, David Somerset, William L. Martin, R. L. Holder, Gendie E. Lash, Catherine Meads and Elizabeth Ball. Their work appears in journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica and International Journal of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact