Caroline Bower

7 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Caroline Bower
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 96
  • Epidemiology 158
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 107
  • Health 30
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 60
Replace Douglas G. Armstrong with:
Douglas G. Armstrong United States
Aljohara Mohammed Alquaiz Saudi Arabia
Line Sletner Norway
Begüm Yıldızhan Türkiye
Grace Hyojung Yoon United States
Ahmed Ali Madar Norway
Cátia Millene Dell Agnolo Brazil
Jennifer B Saunders Australia
Nicola Germain France
Caroline Bähler Switzerland
Caroline Bower relative to Douglas G. Armstrong United States Douglas G. Armstrong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Douglas G. Armstrong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Bower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Bower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Bower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Bower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Bower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Bower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Bower. The network helps show where Caroline Bower may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Bower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Bower Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Bower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
The quanitification of drug caused morbidity and mortality in Australia: Part 1
1995394
2 2010120
3 200330
4 200914
5 20127
6
The quantification of drug caused morbidity and mortality in mortality in Australia, 1995
19956
7 19972
8 20181
9 20220

About Caroline Bower

Caroline Bower is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Small Animals, Economics and Econometrics, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (1 paper), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (1 paper) and Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (96 citations), Epidemiology (158 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (107 citations), Health (30 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (60 citations). Caroline Bower has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Matthew William Knuiman, Jim Codde, Dallas R. English, Billie Giles‐Corti, Gill F Lewin, Nicholas Hubert de Klerk, Gary Kenneth Hulse, Elizabeth Milne, Vivienne P. Dawes and Gillian A. Ryan. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular Teratology, Veterinary Record, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology and Veterinary Nursing Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact