Carole Smith

31 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

Carole Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Safety Research 144
  • Public Administration 61
  • General Health Professions 148
  • Health Information Management 28
  • Clinical Psychology 118
Replace Ian Gibbs with:
Ian Gibbs United Kingdom
Katherine van Wormer United States
Paula Dressel United States
Karen Kay Kirst-Ashman
Harold E. Briggs United States
Joan R. Rycraft United States
Suellen Murray Australia
Anne Opie New Zealand
Tony Vinson Australia
J. Jay Miller United States
Carole Smith relative to Ian Gibbs United Kingdom Ian Gibbs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Ian Gibbs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carole Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carole Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carole Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carole Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carole Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carole Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carole Smith. The network helps show where Carole Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Carole Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carole Smith Line = papers co-authored together Carole Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200476
2 200563
3 198458
4 199051
5 200349
6 196738
7 196631
8 199730
9 200023
10 200221
11
After Adoption: Direct Contact and Relationships
200318
12
Adoptive Parenthood as a 'Legal Fiction' - Its Consequences for Direct Post-Adoption Contact
200210
13 198210
14 20056
15 20076
16 20045
17 19995
18 19964
19
Adoption and Fostering: Why and How
19843
20 19973

About Carole Smith

Carole Smith is a scholar working on Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Public Administration and Education, having authored 38 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (10 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (7 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (4 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (144 citations), Public Administration (61 citations), General Health Professions (148 citations), Health Information Management (28 citations) and Clinical Psychology (118 citations). Carole Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Harrison, Stephen Harrison, Robert L. Hamblin, Richard H. Willis, Michael S. Wald, P. Herbert Leiderman, Elaine Walton, Paul R. Gardner, Heather Dale and Corinne Wattam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Journal of Law and Society, Journal of Social Work, Children & Society and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact