Can Chen

592 citations
31 papers · 455 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Can Chen

30 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Can Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Modeling and Simulation 71
  • Ceramics and Composites 26
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 108
  • Plant Science 127
  • Metals and Alloys 7
Replace Heting Zhang with:
Heting Zhang China
Dil Bahadur Gurung Nepal
Olivier Bonnefon France
Yi Song China
Frédéric Grognard France
Yongkuk Kim South Korea
Mahmoud Kamal Egypt
Olusegun Adebayo Ajala Nigeria
A. G. Vijaya Kumar India
Youcef Mammeri France
Can Chen relative to Heting Zhang China Heting Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Heting Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Can Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Can Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Can Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Can Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Can Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Can Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Can Chen. The network helps show where Can Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Can Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Can Chen Line = papers co-authored together Can Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201859
2 201048
3 201638
4 201638
5 202027
6 202124
7 201623
8 202220
9 201719
10 201717
11 201716
12 202214
13 201712
14 202110
15 202010
16 201410
17 20239
18 20169
19 20188
20 20207

About Can Chen

Can Chen is a scholar working on Plant Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Modeling and Simulation, Mechanics of Materials and Genetics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (7 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (5 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (4 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (4 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (3 papers), Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (3 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (3 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (71 citations), Ceramics and Composites (26 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (108 citations), Plant Science (127 citations) and Metals and Alloys (7 citations). Can Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, Canada and Sri Lanka. Frequent co-authors include Yanmei Kang, Jiandong Xing, Yimin Gao, Robert J. Smith, Yun Gao, Xin Wang, Jie Huang, Rui Zhu, Jiwei Yang and Jun Sun. Their work appears in journals such as Abstract and Applied Analysis, Mathematical Biosciences, Journal of Plant Physiology, Applied Physics Letters and Wear.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact