C. William Larson

45 papers receiving 971 citations

Peers

C. William Larson
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Ceramics and Composites 120
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 121
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 130
  • Catalysis 79
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 263
Replace Andrew J. Matheson with:
Andrew J. Matheson United Kingdom
Marcello Lucchesi Italy
Yu. I. Naberukhin Russia
Jean-Louis Barrat France
Ratan Joarder India
N. P. Malomuzh Ukraine
Yu. D. Fomin Russia
Grant S. Heffelfinger United States
Caroline Desgranges United States
Émeric Bourasseau France
C. William Larson relative to Andrew J. Matheson United Kingdom Andrew J. Matheson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
Andrew J. Matheson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. William Larson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. William Larson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. William Larson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. William Larson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. William Larson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. William Larson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. William Larson. The network helps show where C. William Larson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. William Larson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. William Larson Line = papers co-authored together C. William Larson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008125
2 1989114
3 198597
4 198875
5 200959
6 197239
7 199639
8 199736
9 198431
10 199929
11 199527
12 196727
13 196926
14 200625
15 196824
16 197123
17 199622
18 199919
19 196617
20 196814

About C. William Larson

C. William Larson is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Catalysis and Organic Chemistry, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (13 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (6 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (6 papers), Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research (6 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (6 papers), Radical Photochemical Reactions (4 papers), Space Satellite Systems and Control (4 papers) and Rocket and propulsion systems research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ceramics and Composites (120 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (121 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (130 citations), Catalysis (79 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (263 citations). C. William Larson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Mark Golden, B. S. Rabinovitch, P. G. Carrick, José Domingo Presilla-Márquez, Dwight C. Tardy, D.F. McMillen, Alicia C. Gonzalez, Daniel L. Brown, Mary Elizabeth Smith and Steve A. Feller. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemical Physics Letters, Combustion and Flame, The Journal of Physical Chemistry and International Journal of Chemical Kinetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact