C. Scott Bailey

28 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

C. Scott Bailey
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Equine 104
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 144
  • Small Animals 88
  • Microbiology 22
  • Reproductive Medicine 24
Replace Natali Krekeler with:
Natali Krekeler Australia
Harutaka MURASE Japan
Pedro Paulo Maia Teixeira Brazil
S.K. Lyle United States
W. Thomas Riddle United States
Wayne G. Etherington Canada
Claire Card Canada
Denis Vaillancourt Canada
J. M. Kelly United Kingdom
Noha Y. Salem Egypt
C. Scott Bailey relative to Natali Krekeler Australia Natali Krekeler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Natali Krekeler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Scott Bailey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Scott Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Scott Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Scott Bailey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Scott Bailey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Scott Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Scott Bailey. The network helps show where C. Scott Bailey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Scott Bailey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Scott Bailey Line = papers co-authored together C. Scott Bailey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201057
2 201436
3 201128
4 200822
5 201319
6 201219
7 201117
8 201112
9 201211
10 20209
11 20138
12 20078
13 20185
14 20195
15 20204
16 20144
17 20194
18 20143
19 20203
20 20143

About C. Scott Bailey

C. Scott Bailey is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Small Animals, Equine, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (17 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (9 papers), Animal health and immunology (6 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (3 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (3 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (104 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (144 citations), Small Animals (88 citations), Microbiology (22 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (24 citations). C. Scott Bailey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Margo L. Macpherson, Małgorzata A. Pozor, Mats H.T. Troedsson, Megan E. Jacob, Michael W. Wood, Shelly L. Vaden, Thomas W. Vickroy, Michelle M. LeBlanc, M. D. Whitacre and Steeve Giguère. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, Theriogenology, Equine Veterinary Journal, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine and Global Spine Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact