C. Schmandt

788 citations
27 papers · 503 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

C. Schmandt

25 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

C. Schmandt
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Human-Computer Interaction 245
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 203
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 27
  • Information Systems and Management 49
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 97
Replace Beth Yost with:
Beth Yost United States
Theophanis Tsandilas France
Susanne Jul United States
Thea Turner United States
Rosalee Wolfe United States
David Carr United States
Stéphane Huot France
Christopher F. Herot United States
Yvonne Jansen France
C. Schmandt relative to Beth Yost United States Beth Yost's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Beth Yost · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Schmandt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Schmandt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Schmandt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Schmandt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Schmandt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Schmandt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Schmandt. The network helps show where C. Schmandt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside C. Schmandt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Schmandt Line = papers co-authored together C. Schmandt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198390
2 198358
3 200553
4 199446
5
Voice communication with computers
199334
6 200829
7 200029
8 199029
9 200228
10 198225
11
PHONE SLAVE: A GRAPHICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERFACE
198516
12 200412
13 198310
14 19948
15 20027
16
Voice Communications with Computers
19946
17 20036
18 19964
19 19893
20 20043

About C. Schmandt

C. Schmandt is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems, having authored 27 papers that have together received 503 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech and dialogue systems (7 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (5 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (4 papers), Music and Audio Processing (3 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (3 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (3 papers) and Augmented Reality Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (245 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (203 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (27 citations), Information Systems and Management (49 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (97 citations). C. Schmandt has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nitin Sawhney, Natalia Marmasse, Emmanuel Munguia Tapia, Pattie Maes, Mark S. Ackerman, Debby Hindus, Barry Arons, Stefan Marti, Deb Roy and Charles J. Simmons. Their work appears in journals such as IBM Systems Journal, Computer, Displays, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics and IEEE Network.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact