C. M. Schultz

849 citations
24 papers · 655 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

C. M. Schultz

24 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers

C. M. Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 466
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 577
  • Instrumentation 25
  • Condensed Matter Physics 44
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 20
Replace D. A. Vinokurov with:
D. A. Vinokurov Russia
Matthew Peters United States
Mitsuru Ekawa Japan
J. Kaniewski Poland
Y. Mizushima Japan
Vilius Palenskis Lithuania
N. Bar-Chaim United States
Constance J. Chang-Hasnain United States
W. Susaki Japan
Masanori Nagase Japan
C. M. Schultz relative to D. A. Vinokurov Russia D. A. Vinokurov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
D. A. Vinokurov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. M. Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. M. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. M. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. M. Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. M. Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. M. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. M. Schultz. The network helps show where C. M. Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. M. Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. M. Schultz Line = papers co-authored together C. M. Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013178
2 2008110
3 201068
4 201263
5 201257
6 200736
7 201023
8 201221
9 201016
10 201115
11 200710
12 200910
13 20119
14 20127
15 20126
16 20126
17 20124
18 20143
19 20093
20 20093

About C. M. Schultz

C. M. Schultz is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation, Computational Mechanics and Spectroscopy, having authored 24 papers that have together received 655 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (15 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (14 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (10 papers), Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (7 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (6 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (4 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (4 papers) and Laser Design and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (466 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (577 citations), Instrumentation (25 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (44 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (20 citations). C. M. Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include P. Crump, H. Wenzel, G. Erbert, Ch. Heyn, D. Heitmann, H. Welsch, Ch. Strelow, Tobias Kipp, F. Bugge and G. Tränkle. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Semiconductor Science and Technology, Journal of Crystal Growth and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact