C. Love

720 citations
21 papers · 485 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

C. Love

20 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers

C. Love
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 200
  • Cancer Research 148
  • Genetics 218
  • Reproductive Medicine 65
  • Oncology 151
Replace Andrew C. McGill with:
Andrew C. McGill United Kingdom
A. Jones United Kingdom
Merja B. Marttunen Finland
Ingolf Juhasz-Böess Germany
Louise M. Rasmussen Denmark
Russell Hogg Australia
E. De Muylder Belgium
G. Vanderick Belgium
Reinhold Bergstr�m Sweden
Winston Ueno United States
C. Love relative to Andrew C. McGill United Kingdom Andrew C. McGill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Andrew C. McGill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Love

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Love's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Love with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Love more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Love

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Love. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Love. The network helps show where C. Love may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Love, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Love Line = papers co-authored together C. Love links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199992
2 200181
3 199946
4 199645
5 199835
6 199432
7 201330
8 200422
9 200422
10 202018
11 201713
12 201211
13 199811
14 20008
15 20145
16 19844
17 19974
18 19973
19 19971
20 20121

About C. Love

C. Love is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Genetics, Oncology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Estrogen and related hormone effects (6 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (3 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (3 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (200 citations), Cancer Research (148 citations), Genetics (218 citations), Reproductive Medicine (65 citations) and Oncology (151 citations). C. Love has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include J. Michael Dixon, William R. Miller, Euan M. Wallace, Renaud Léonard, David Cameron, Robert Leonard, Christopher Bellamy, B.B. Muir, J. Michael Dixon and J.B. Scrimgeour. Their work appears in journals such as The Breast, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal, Diabetic Medicine, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth and International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact