C. L. Ewing

28 papers receiving 761 citations

Peers

C. L. Ewing
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 715
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 136
  • Ophthalmology 85
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 62
  • Pharmacology 121
Replace Nabih M. Alem with:
Nabih M. Alem United States
L. M. Patrick United States
H. R. Lissner United States
C Tarrière France
Bertil Aldman Sweden
V. R. Hodgson United States
Koshiro Ono Japan
Jiangyue Zhang United States
Paul C. Begeman United States
Felix Walz Switzerland
C. L. Ewing relative to Nabih M. Alem United States Nabih M. Alem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Nabih M. Alem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. L. Ewing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. L. Ewing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. L. Ewing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. L. Ewing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. L. Ewing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. L. Ewing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. L. Ewing. The network helps show where C. L. Ewing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. L. Ewing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. L. Ewing Line = papers co-authored together C. L. Ewing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995226
2 199597
3
Human Head and Neck Response to Impact Acceleration.
197282
4 197559
5 197654
6 197751
7 196850
8 197350
9 197447
10 196944
11 197831
12 197529
13 197825
14 198123
15 197220
16 197714
17
DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF HUMAN AND PRIMATE HEAD AND NECK TO +GY IMPACT ACCELERATION
197811
18 19837
19 19947
20 19827

About C. L. Ewing

C. L. Ewing is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 956 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (19 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (4 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (2 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (2 papers) and Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (715 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (136 citations), Ophthalmology (85 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (62 citations) and Pharmacology (121 citations). C. L. Ewing has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Thomas, Daniel J. Thomas, Anthony Sances, William H. Muzzy, Narayan Yoganandan, Frank A. Pintar, Richard G. Snyder, Patrick Walsh, Albert I. King and Leonard S. Lustick. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Journal of Biomechanics, Journal of Neurotrauma, Journal of Applied Mechanics and Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact