C. Graef

8.1k citations
33 papers · 6.3k · 3 hit papers · h-index 31

Impact in

    • Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
    • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
    • Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
    • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
    • Black Holes and Theoretical Physics

Papers in

C. Graef

33 papers receiving 6.1k citations

C. Graef's Hit Papers

GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2 2017 · 2k citations
2k0+5+10Years since publication5001k1.5k2k

Peers

C. Graef
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 5.3k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 580
  • Artificial Intelligence 435
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 330
  • Instrumentation 25
Replace V. Quetschke with:
V. Quetschke United States
L. Wallace United States
C. Mueller United States
C. Osthelder United States
C. I. Torrie United States
D. Schaetzl United States
E. Ochsner Germany
Y. Asali United States
J. D. Jones United States
Eyal Schwartz United States
C. Graef relative to V. Quetschke United States V. Quetschke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
V. Quetschke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Graef

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Graef's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Graef with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Graef more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Graef

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Graef. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Graef. The network helps show where C. Graef may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2
Hit paper breakdown →
20172006
2
Predictions for the rates of compact binary coalescences observable by ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Hit paper breakdown →
2010934
3
A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit
Hit paper breakdown →
2011724
4 2018207
5 2012190
6 2013142
7 2010112
8 2012112
9 2012112
10 2010110
11
Einstein gravitational wave Telescope conceptual design study
2011108
12 2010107
13 2018106
14 2011100
15 201397
16 201196
17 201396
18 201785
19 201279
20 201276

About C. Graef

C. Graef is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 33 papers that have together received 6.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (33 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (5.3k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (580 citations), Artificial Intelligence (435 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (330 citations) and Instrumentation (25 citations). C. Graef has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Physical review. D, Physical Review Letters, Classical and Quantum Gravity and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact