C. E. Peper

3.6k citations
88 papers · 3.0k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

C. E. Peper

88 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

C. E. Peper
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 532
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.0k
  • Rehabilitation 314
  • Social Psychology 707
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 349
Replace J. P. Scholz with:
J. P. Scholz United States
Daichi Nozaki Japan
Jean-Jacques Temprado France
Bruce A. Kay United States
James R. Tresilian Australia
John J. Buchanan United States
Robert J. van Beers Netherlands
Pier–Giorgio Zanone France
Adrian M. Haith United States
Ramesh Balasubramaniam United States
C. E. Peper relative to J. P. Scholz United States J. P. Scholz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
J. P. Scholz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. E. Peper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. E. Peper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. E. Peper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. E. Peper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. E. Peper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. E. Peper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. E. Peper. The network helps show where C. E. Peper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. E. Peper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. E. Peper Line = papers co-authored together C. E. Peper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995160
2 1995124
3 2012109
4 1995105
5 2000102
6 200295
7 201187
8 199686
9 199280
10 201279
11 200572
12 199870
13 200568
14 201868
15 201265
16 200563
17 200662
18 200259
19 199558
20 200553

About C. E. Peper

C. E. Peper is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 88 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motor Control and Adaptation (48 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (22 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (22 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (20 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (8 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (8 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (532 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.0k citations), Rehabilitation (314 citations), Social Psychology (707 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (349 citations). C. E. Peper has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Beek, Andreas Daffertshofer, Melvyn Roerdink, Piet C. W. van Wieringen, Paulina J.M. Bank, Gert Kwakkel, Joost C. Dessing, Dick F. Stegeman, Harjo J. de Poel and Hermann Haken. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Human Movement Science, Biological Cybernetics, Gait & Posture and Journal of Motor Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact