C. E. Cox
Impact in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
-
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Papers in
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 4
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Tracie Locklear (1 shared paper)Gregory P. Samsa (1 shared paper)Andrea L. Pusic (1 shared paper)E. Shelley Hwang (1 shared paper)Amy P. Abernethy (1 shared paper)Christel Rushing (1 shared paper)Michael R. Zenn (1 shared paper)Dunya Atisha (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Annals of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)The Journal of Infectious Diseases (1 paper)Breast Diseases A Year Book Quarterly (1 paper)PubMed (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
C. E. Cox
8 papers receiving 321 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Cancer Research 136
- Surgery 128
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 52
- Oncology 72
- Dermatology 15
Countries citing papers authored by C. E. Cox
This map shows the geographic impact of C. E. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. E. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. E. Cox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. E. Cox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. E. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. E. Cox. The network helps show where C. E. Cox may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. E. Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 154 | |
| 2 | NCCN Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer. | 2000 | 98 |
| 3 | Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins. | 1998 | 35 |
| 4 | Cytology of lumpectomy specimens. | 1991 | 29 |
| 5 | Natural history and clinical evaluation of the lumpectomy scar. | 1993 | 11 |
| 6 | Role of fine needle aspiration cytology after lumpectomy. | 1995 | 8 |
| 7 | Symposium on oral indanyl carbenicillin in the treatment of urinary-tract infection. Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana. June 6, 1972. | 1973 | 2 |
| 8 | 2014 | 2 |
About C. E. Cox
C. E. Cox is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research, Surgery, Dermatology and Epidemiology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (1 paper), Urinary Tract Infections Management (1 paper), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (1 paper) and Fungal Infections and Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (136 citations), Surgery (128 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (52 citations), Oncology (72 citations) and Dermatology (15 citations). C. E. Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Tracie Locklear, Gregory P. Samsa, Andrea L. Pusic, E. Shelley Hwang, Amy P. Abernethy, Christel Rushing, Michael R. Zenn, Dunya Atisha, Douglas S. Reintgen and Howard M. Greenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgical Oncology, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Breast Diseases A Year Book Quarterly and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.