C. Cans

633 citations
8 papers · 332 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

C. Cans

8 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

C. Cans
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 68
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 92
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 14
  • Epidemiology 69
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 3
Replace Nader Z. Rabie with:
Nader Z. Rabie United States
Glenda Hawley Australia
Mary B. Munn United States
Ashraf Kharrat Canada
Victor Hugo Gonzalez Quintero United States
Dushyant Maharaj New Zealand
Ranjith Kamity United States
María G. Sáenz Argentina
Carolyn A. Lane Canada
Birhanu Wondimeneh Demissie Ethiopia
C. Cans relative to Nader Z. Rabie United States Nader Z. Rabie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Nader Z. Rabie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Cans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Cans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Cans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Cans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Cans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Cans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Cans. The network helps show where C. Cans may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Cans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Cans Line = papers co-authored together C. Cans links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
European Perinatal Health Report. The health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2010
2013159
2 201061
3 200341
4 199934
5 200716
6 199813
7 20056
8 20092

About C. Cans

C. Cans is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (1 paper), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (1 paper), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (1 paper), Coronary Artery Anomalies (1 paper), Birth, Development, and Health (1 paper) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (68 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (92 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (14 citations), Epidemiology (69 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (3 citations). C. Cans has collaborated with scholars based in France. Frequent co-authors include Pierre‐Simon Jouk, Patrice François, Isabelle Pin, Patricia Pavèse, José Labarère, Elisabeth Robert, Saskia K. Klein, Sophie Alexander, Béatrice Blondel and Jennifer Zeitlin. Their work appears in journals such as Prenatal Diagnosis, Acta Paediatrica, Archives de Pédiatrie, Revue de médecine périnatale and TNO Repository.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact