Britt‐Inger Saveman

105 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Britt‐Inger Saveman
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 620
  • Applied Psychology 220
  • Demography 478
  • Health 290
  • Clinical Psychology 665
Replace Riitta Suhonen with:
Riitta Suhonen Finland
Debra Parker Oliver United States
William S. Shaw United States
Theo W.N. Dassen Germany
Frances Kam Yuet Wong Hong Kong
Tage S. Kristensen Denmark
Judith E. Hupcey United States
Katherine A. Ornstein United States
Evridiki Papastavrou Cyprus
Nahid Dehghan Nayeri Iran
Britt‐Inger Saveman relative to Riitta Suhonen Finland Riitta Suhonen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Riitta Suhonen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Britt‐Inger Saveman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Britt‐Inger Saveman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Britt‐Inger Saveman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Britt‐Inger Saveman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Britt‐Inger Saveman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Britt‐Inger Saveman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Britt‐Inger Saveman. The network helps show where Britt‐Inger Saveman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Britt‐Inger Saveman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Britt‐Inger Saveman Line = papers co-authored together Britt‐Inger Saveman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001267
2 2008136
3 2008117
4 2003100
5 200695
6 200894
7 199887
8 201385
9 200485
10 201384
11 200282
12 200281
13 201275
14 199969
15 200967
16 200966
17 200864
18 200660
19 200859
20 200557

About Britt‐Inger Saveman

Britt‐Inger Saveman is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Demography, Clinical Psychology, Health and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 112 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Elder Abuse and Neglect (24 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (18 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (11 papers), Disaster Response and Management (9 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (9 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (9 papers), Family Support in Illness (8 papers) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (620 citations), Applied Psychology (220 citations), Demography (478 citations), Health (290 citations) and Clinical Psychology (665 citations). Britt‐Inger Saveman has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Eva Benzein, Astrid Norberg, Ulf Björnstig, Pauline E. Johansson, Kristofer Franzén Årestedt, Sture Åström, Kerstin Blomqvist, Gunilla Nilsson, Gösta Bucht and Wenche Malmedal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Family Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, International Emergency Nursing and European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact