Britt‐Inger Saveman

108 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Britt‐Inger Saveman
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 762
  • Applied Psychology 268
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
  • Health 399
  • Demography 548
Replace Theo Dassen with:
Theo Dassen Germany
Rosaria Alvaro Italy
Debra Parker Oliver United States
Judith E. Arnetz United States
Judith E. Hupcey United States
Fazlollah Ahmadi Iran
Muayyad Ahmad Jordan
Masoud Fallahi‐Khoshknab Iran
Richard Sawatzky Canada
David B. Bekelman United States
Britt‐Inger Saveman relative to Theo Dassen Germany Theo Dassen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Theo Dassen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Britt‐Inger Saveman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Britt‐Inger Saveman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Britt‐Inger Saveman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Britt‐Inger Saveman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Britt‐Inger Saveman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Britt‐Inger Saveman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Britt‐Inger Saveman. The network helps show where Britt‐Inger Saveman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Britt‐Inger Saveman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Britt‐Inger Saveman Line = papers co-authored together Britt‐Inger Saveman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 119 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001253
2 2008118
3 2008115
4 2003102
5 200891
6 199890
7 200485
8 200684
9 201380
10 200280
11 200277
12 201376
13 199975
14 201267
15 200966
16 200965
17 200861
18 200660
19 200058
20 200858

About Britt‐Inger Saveman

Britt‐Inger Saveman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Sociology and Political Science, Demography and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 119 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Elder Abuse and Neglect (27 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (24 papers), Disaster Response and Management (16 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (14 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (12 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (12 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (10 papers) and Family Support in Illness (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (762 citations), Applied Psychology (268 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Health (399 citations) and Demography (548 citations). Britt‐Inger Saveman has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Eva Benzein, Astrid Norberg, Ulf Björnstig, Pauline Johansson, Sture Åström, Kristofer Årestedt, Kerstin Blomqvist, Gösta Bucht, Gunilla Nilsson and Wenche Malmedal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Family Nursing, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Emergency Nursing and European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact