Brian Easlea
Impact in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- History of Science and Medicine
- Philosophy and History of Science
- History top 5%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Papers in
-
- History of Science and Medicine 4
- Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies 2
-
- Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life 1
- Historical Astronomy and Related Studies 1
- Origins and Evolution of Life 1
- Co-authors
- Charles Webster (1 shared paper)Jeffrey Burton Russell (1 shared paper)Brian Vickers (1 shared paper)Brian P. Copenhaver (1 shared paper)Carolyn Merchant (1 shared paper)Margaret C. Jacob (1 shared paper)Morris Berman (1 shared paper)John Bowle (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (5 papers)Journal of the History of Ideas (1 paper)The History Teacher (1 paper)Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Brian Easlea
8 papers receiving 110 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- History and Philosophy of Science 36
- History 35
- Philosophy 32
- Religious studies 12
- Anthropology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Brian Easlea
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Easlea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Easlea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Easlea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Easlea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Easlea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Easlea. The network helps show where Brian Easlea may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Brian Easlea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 52 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 38 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 18 | |
| 5 | La liberación social y los objetivos de la ciencia: un ensayo sobre objetividad y compromiso en las ciencias sociales y naturales | 1977 | 2 |
| 6 | 1973 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 0 |
About Brian Easlea
Brian Easlea is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory and History, having authored 9 papers that have together received 155 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (2 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (1 paper), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (1 paper), Origins and Evolution of Life (1 paper), Social Sciences and Policies (1 paper) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (36 citations), History (35 citations), Philosophy (32 citations), Religious studies (12 citations) and Anthropology (20 citations). Brian Easlea has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charles Webster, Jeffrey Burton Russell, Brian Vickers, Brian P. Copenhaver, Carolyn Merchant, Margaret C. Jacob, Morris Berman and John Bowle. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of the History of Ideas, The History Teacher and Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.