Brian Easlea
Impact in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Papers in
-
- History of Science and Medicine 4
- Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies 2
-
- Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life 1
- Origins and Evolution of Life 1
- Co-authors
- Charles Webster (1 shared paper)Brian Vickers (1 shared paper)Jeffrey Burton Russell (1 shared paper)Morris Berman (1 shared paper)Margaret C. Jacob (1 shared paper)Brian P. Copenhaver (1 shared paper)John Bowle (1 shared paper)Carolyn Merchant (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (5 papers)Journal of the History of Ideas (1 paper)Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (1 paper)The History Teacher (1 paper)Elsevier eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Brian Easlea
8 papers receiving 170 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- History and Philosophy of Science 100
- Philosophy 97
- History 81
- Anthropology 56
- Classics 22
Countries citing papers authored by Brian Easlea
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Easlea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Easlea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Easlea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Easlea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Easlea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Easlea. The network helps show where Brian Easlea may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Brian Easlea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 128 | |
| 2 | 1985 | 58 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 51 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 46 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 2 | |
| 7 | La liberación social y los objetivos de la ciencia: un ensayo sobre objetividad y compromiso en las ciencias sociales y naturales | 1977 | 2 |
| 8 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 0 |
About Brian Easlea
Brian Easlea is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory and History, having authored 10 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (2 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper), Social Sciences and Policies (1 paper), Origins and Evolution of Life (1 paper), Literature: history, themes, analysis (1 paper) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (100 citations), Philosophy (97 citations), History (81 citations), Anthropology (56 citations) and Classics (22 citations). Brian Easlea has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charles Webster, Brian Vickers, Jeffrey Burton Russell, Morris Berman, Margaret C. Jacob, Brian P. Copenhaver, John Bowle and Carolyn Merchant. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of the History of Ideas, Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja), The History Teacher and Elsevier eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.