Bram Van Hoe

593 citations
42 papers · 464 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Bram Van Hoe

41 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Bram Van Hoe
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 334
  • Biomedical Engineering 202
  • Bioengineering 23
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 55
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 75
Replace Erwin Bosman with:
Erwin Bosman Belgium
C.M.A. Ashruf Netherlands
Hyungcheol Shin South Korea
Nguyen Binh-Khiem Japan
J. D. Plummer United States
Yu‐Chia Liu Taiwan
Xiangguang Han China
Yu-Tse Lai Taiwan
Hadi Veladi Iran
Manik Dautta United States
Bram Van Hoe relative to Erwin Bosman Belgium Erwin Bosman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Erwin Bosman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bram Van Hoe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bram Van Hoe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bram Van Hoe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bram Van Hoe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bram Van Hoe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bram Van Hoe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bram Van Hoe. The network helps show where Bram Van Hoe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bram Van Hoe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bram Van Hoe Line = papers co-authored together Bram Van Hoe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201490
2 201141
3 201141
4 201741
5 201040
6 201224
7 201214
8 201014
9 200913
10 201912
11 201512
12 201610
13 20159
14 20108
15 20118
16 20167
17 20117
18 20187
19 20107
20 20126

About Bram Van Hoe

Bram Van Hoe is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Bioengineering and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 42 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (26 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (25 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (22 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (9 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (9 papers), Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (7 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (4 papers) and Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (334 citations), Biomedical Engineering (202 citations), Bioengineering (23 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (55 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (75 citations). Bram Van Hoe has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Geert Van Steenberge, Jeroen Missinne, Erwin Bosman, Jan Vanfleteren, Peter Van Daele, J. Van Roosbroeck, Eric Lindner, Thomas Geernaert, Francis Berghmans and Johan Vlekken. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Smart Materials and Structures, IEEE Sensors Journal and Sensors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact