Boon‐Whatt Lim

945 citations
10 papers · 724 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms 10
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 2
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 2

Boon‐Whatt Lim

10 papers receiving 708 citations

Peers

Boon‐Whatt Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Rheumatology 442
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 53
  • Surgery 227
  • Biomedical Engineering 190
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 12
Replace Gláucia Helena Gonçalves with:
Gláucia Helena Gonçalves Brazil
Aderson Loureiro Australia
R.E. Voorneman Netherlands
Hope Davis‐Wilson United States
Elizabeth Wellsandt United States
Kristyn M. Leitch Canada
Hsiang‐Ling Teng United States
Atsushi Nawata Japan
Tarja Lyytinen Finland
Heide Boeth Germany
Boon‐Whatt Lim relative to Gláucia Helena Gonçalves Brazil Gláucia Helena Gonçalves's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×46×
Gláucia Helena Gonçalves · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Boon‐Whatt Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Boon‐Whatt Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Boon‐Whatt Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boon‐Whatt Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Boon‐Whatt Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Boon‐Whatt Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Boon‐Whatt Lim. The network helps show where Boon‐Whatt Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Boon‐Whatt Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Boon‐Whatt Lim Line = papers co-authored together Boon‐Whatt Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2008200
2 2012186
3 2008147
4 201046
5 200935
6 200834
7 200831
8 201718
9 201316
10 202111

About Boon‐Whatt Lim

Boon‐Whatt Lim is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 10 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (10 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (4 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (2 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (442 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (53 citations), Surgery (227 citations), Biomedical Engineering (190 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (12 citations). Boon‐Whatt Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Singapore and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rana S. Hinman, Kim L. Bennell, Tim V. Wrigley, Michael A. Hunt, Leena Sharma, Ben Metcalf, Kelly‐Ann Bowles, Kay M. Crossley, Crystal O. Kean and Mark W. Creaby. Their work appears in journals such as Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, Arthritis Care & Research, Clinical Biomechanics, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders and The Knee.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact