Bing Yu

1.3k citations
89 papers · 944 · h-index 18

Impact in

  • Accounting top 5%
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
    • Gender Diversity and Inequality

Papers in

Bing Yu

78 papers receiving 895 citations

Peers

Bing Yu
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Accounting 214
  • Gender Studies 89
  • Control and Systems Engineering 207
  • Finance 63
  • Strategy and Management 91
Replace Ran Zhang with:
Ran Zhang China
Bo Ouyang China
Yuxuan Huang China
Woo‐Seok Choi South Korea
Man Wang China
Andrea Cardoni United Kingdom
Jyoti Gupta India
Ruxi Wang United States
S. Ramesh India
Kjetil K. Haugen Norway
Bing Yu relative to Ran Zhang China Ran Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.8×
Ran Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bing Yu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bing Yu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bing Yu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bing Yu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bing Yu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bing Yu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bing Yu. The network helps show where Bing Yu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bing Yu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bing Yu Line = papers co-authored together Bing Yu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014122
2 200656
3 200650
4 201647
5 202345
6 200735
7 200435
8 198935
9 202131
10 202028
11 201725
12 202325
13 201125
14 201825
15 201621
16 202421
17 202121
18 201217
19 201117
20 202316

About Bing Yu

Bing Yu is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Accounting, Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 89 papers that have together received 944 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (11 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (8 papers), Real-time simulation and control systems (8 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (6 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (6 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (6 papers), Microgrid Control and Optimization (5 papers) and Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (214 citations), Gender Studies (89 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (207 citations), Finance (63 citations) and Strategy and Management (91 citations). Bing Yu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mary Jane Lenard, Cornelis A. Los, Tianhong Zhang, Tong Zhang, Pervaiz Alam, G.J. Yu, Shuang Cao, Xiaoyi Xu, Jaeho Choi and Joonho So. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, Measurement, Electronics, Sensors and Neurocomputing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact