Bing Lü

2.9k citations
118 papers · 2.1k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Bing Lü

109 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Bing Lü
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Biomaterials 251
  • Polymers and Plastics 243
  • Organic Chemistry 427
  • Biomedical Engineering 540
  • Materials Chemistry 563
Replace Ildikó Badea with:
Ildikó Badea Canada
Bruno Pitard France
Nagesh Kolishetti United States
Olga Janoušková Czechia
Peisheng Xu United States
Wenjun Du United States
Arihiro Kano Japan
Wangxiao He China
Imran Vhora India
Olga B. Garbuzenko United States
Bing Lü relative to Ildikó Badea Canada Ildikó Badea's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Ildikó Badea · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bing Lü

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bing Lü's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bing Lü with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bing Lü more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bing Lü

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bing Lü. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bing Lü. The network helps show where Bing Lü may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bing Lü, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bing Lü Line = papers co-authored together Bing Lü links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 118 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018180
2 2015115
3 2015107
4 202177
5 202261
6 202259
7 200957
8 202155
9 202254
10 200251
11 201749
12 202048
13 202247
14 202243
15 201743
16 202040
17 202238
18 202235
19 202134
20 202234

About Bing Lü

Bing Lü is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 118 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (27 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (19 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (17 papers), Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (8 papers), Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (6 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (5 papers) and Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (251 citations), Polymers and Plastics (243 citations), Organic Chemistry (427 citations), Biomedical Engineering (540 citations) and Materials Chemistry (563 citations). Bing Lü has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Yong Yao, Yang Wang, Yue Ding, Jin Wang, Xiaowei Zhan, Jiarong Lian, Pengju Zeng, Zhecheng Zhang, Fangfang Niu and Xiaolei Yuan. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Chemical Communications, ACS Macro Letters, Cancer Medicine and Acta Biomaterialia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact