Bin Yang

5k citations
200 papers · 4.2k · h-index 36

Impact in

  • Pharmacology top 0.2%
    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Biotechnology top 0.2%
    • Marine Sponges and Natural Products

Papers in

Bin Yang

194 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Peers

Bin Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Pharmacology 2.3k
  • Biotechnology 883
  • Aquatic Science 253
  • Drug Discovery 3
  • Molecular Biology 621
Replace Xiuping Lin with:
Xiuping Lin China
Mercedes Cueto Spain
Arihiro Iwasaki Japan
Qianqun Gu China
Diaa T. A. Youssef Egypt
Jung‐Rae Rho South Korea
Sherif S. Ebada Egypt
Tianjiao Zhu China
Ahmed Abdel‐Lateff Egypt
Zhizhen Zhang China
Bin Yang relative to Xiuping Lin China Xiuping Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Xiuping Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bin Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bin Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bin Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bin Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bin Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bin Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bin Yang. The network helps show where Bin Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bin Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bin Yang Line = papers co-authored together Bin Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 200 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013134
2 2018105
3 2011103
4 2012102
5 201694
6 201483
7 201582
8 201278
9 202077
10 201476
11 201866
12 201463
13 201563
14 201662
15 201757
16 201856
17 201351
18 201849
19 202148
20 201447

About Bin Yang

Bin Yang is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Biotechnology, Molecular Biology, Aquatic Science and Plant Science, having authored 200 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (118 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (43 papers), Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research (8 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (7 papers), Echinoderm biology and ecology (5 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (4 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers) and Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (2.3k citations), Biotechnology (883 citations), Aquatic Science (253 citations), Drug Discovery (3 citations) and Molecular Biology (621 citations). Bin Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yonghong Liu, Xuefeng Zhou, Xiuping Lin, Junfeng Wang, Xian‐Wen Yang, Shengrong Liao, Xiaowei Luo, Huaming Tao, Xiaoyan Pang and Zhengchao Tu. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Drugs, Chemistry & Biodiversity, Molecules, The Journal of Antibiotics and Tetrahedron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact