Beverly Schmocker

7 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Beverly Schmocker
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Oncology 201
  • Cancer Research 96
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 88
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 148
  • Microbiology 3
Replace Puthuveettil Govindan Jayaprakash with:
Puthuveettil Govindan Jayaprakash India
John M. Nesland Norway
Seijin Nadano Japan
David Casadevall Spain
Sahra Bodo France
Kazuyoshi Kunitomo Japan
Toshiko Yamochi Japan
Kajsa Ericson Lindquist Sweden
Takahiko Sonoda Japan
Ursula Rommerscheidt‐Fuss Germany
Beverly Schmocker relative to Puthuveettil Govindan Jayaprakash India Puthuveettil Govindan Jayaprakash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Puthuveettil Govindan Jayaprakash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beverly Schmocker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beverly Schmocker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beverly Schmocker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beverly Schmocker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beverly Schmocker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beverly Schmocker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beverly Schmocker. The network helps show where Beverly Schmocker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beverly Schmocker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beverly Schmocker Line = papers co-authored together Beverly Schmocker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 1997194
2 1987146
3 200159
4
Comparative dual label study of first and second generation antitumor-associated glycoprotein-72 monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer patients.
199343
5
Extended cervical mediastinoscopy. A single staging procedure for bronchogenic carcinoma of the left upper lobe.
198721
6 199714
7 19936

About Beverly Schmocker

Beverly Schmocker is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 7 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1 paper), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (201 citations), Cancer Research (96 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (88 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (148 citations) and Microbiology (3 citations). Beverly Schmocker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Paul F. Waters, Thomas W. Rice, Robert J. Ginsberg, Melvyn Goldberg, Steven N. Gallinger, Bernard F. Langer, Bryce Taylor, Gerarda Darlington, Nando Di Nicola and Steven A. Narod. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cancer, Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Nature Genetics, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact