Bernhard Schöpf
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 1%
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
- Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
Papers in
-
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery 2
-
- Iron Metabolism and Disorders 2
- Co-authors
- Heinrich Hofmann (4 shared papers)Brigitte von Rechenberg (4 shared papers)Margarete Hofmann (2 shared papers)A. Petri (2 shared papers)Benedikt Steitz (2 shared papers)Annette Koch (1 shared paper)M. Chastellain (1 shared paper)Michael O. Hottiger (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials (3 papers)Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Switzerland
In The Last Decade
Bernhard Schöpf
4 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Bernhard Schöpf's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Biomaterials 864
- Biomedical Engineering 779
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 288
- Molecular Medicine 62
- Pharmaceutical Science 75
Countries citing papers authored by Bernhard Schöpf
This map shows the geographic impact of Bernhard Schöpf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernhard Schöpf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernhard Schöpf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bernhard Schöpf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernhard Schöpf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernhard Schöpf. The network helps show where Bernhard Schöpf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Bernhard Schöpf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Superparamagnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications: Possibilities and limitations of a new drug delivery system Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 1511 |
| 2 | 2005 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 20 | |
| 5 | Das Tötungsrecht bei den frühchristlichen Schriftstellern bis zur Zeit Konstantins | 1958 | 1 |
About Bernhard Schöpf
Bernhard Schöpf is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Hematology, Biomedical Engineering, Classics and Anthropology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (2 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (2 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (1 paper), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (1 paper) and Classical Studies and Legal History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (864 citations), Biomedical Engineering (779 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (288 citations), Molecular Medicine (62 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (75 citations). Bernhard Schöpf has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Heinrich Hofmann, Brigitte von Rechenberg, Margarete Hofmann, A. Petri, Benedikt Steitz, Annette Koch, M. Chastellain, Michael O. Hottiger, Sarah W. Kamau and Lloyd Vaughan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials and Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.