Bernard Proust
Impact in
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Restraint-Related Deaths
- Poisoning and overdose treatments
- Small Animals top 5%
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Papers in
-
- Restraint-Related Deaths 3
- Surgery 2
- Co-authors
- F. Clarot (5 shared papers)Isabelle Le Blanc‐Louvry (5 shared papers)Jean‐Pierre Goullé (1 shared paper)J Thiébot (2 shared papers)J.-N. Dacher (1 shared paper)F. Douvrin (1 shared paper)Didier Hannequin (1 shared paper)Jacques Simonet (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Forensic Science International (4 papers)Journal of Forensic Sciences (2 papers)American Journal of Neuroradiology (1 paper)European Radiology (1 paper)Journal of Analytical Toxicology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Bernard Proust
11 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Emergency Medicine 117
- Small Animals 83
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 33
- Health 48
- Ophthalmology 47
Countries citing papers authored by Bernard Proust
This map shows the geographic impact of Bernard Proust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernard Proust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernard Proust more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bernard Proust
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernard Proust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernard Proust. The network helps show where Bernard Proust may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Bernard Proust, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 103 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 96 | |
| 3 | Giant cervical epidural veins after lumbar puncture in a case of intracranial hypotension. | 2000 | 37 |
| 4 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 3 |
About Bernard Proust
Bernard Proust is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Ophthalmology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Restraint-Related Deaths (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (1 paper) and Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (117 citations), Small Animals (83 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (33 citations), Health (48 citations) and Ophthalmology (47 citations). Bernard Proust has collaborated with scholars based in France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include F. Clarot, Isabelle Le Blanc‐Louvry, Jean‐Pierre Goullé, J Thiébot, J.-N. Dacher, F. Douvrin, Didier Hannequin, Jacques Simonet, Christian Lacroix and Bénédicte Clin. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International, Journal of Forensic Sciences, American Journal of Neuroradiology, European Radiology and Journal of Analytical Toxicology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.